开启辅助访问 切换到宽版

北美户外俱乐部

 找回密码
 注册
搜索
热搜: 活动 交友
查看: 4559|回复: 4

请教子弹问题

[复制链接]
扫一扫,手机访问本帖
发表于 2009-7-24 20:53:01 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
请教 .300 Weatherby Magnum 与 .300 Remington Ultra Magnum 是一样的吗 :?:
发表于 2009-7-25 14:46:23 | 显示全部楼层

数据及其他的比较

数据及其他的比较


没有实际对比使用楼主的这两款 .300 Mag. 只记得当时自己在挑选点300的几款时。 手感等店堂里的摆乎,最后挑选了泊郎林点300。一直感觉不错!

上网为楼主的问题查了一下:输入
300 Weatherby Magnum vs 300 Remington Ultra Magnum

数据上看,似乎差不多
http://www.gunandgame.com/forums ... n-ultra-magnum.html

Both the 300 Wby and 300 RUM have about the same power, with the RUM having the edge by a little, but individual loads will vary more than that difference. Same rim size, but the Wby is a belted magnum, so the case is a bit thinner than the RUM. Headspacing on the shoulder and having a straight, fat case makes the 300 RUM the more accurate design, but the high quality of 300 Wby ammo and guaranteed accuracy of Weatherby rifles make it a potentially better contender for accuracy. The Weatherby's case and throat design make it particularly more efficient than the 300 RUM, and the overall shape seems more conducive to feeding.

Rifle and choices are another issue. Far as I know, the 300 RUM is the round more commonly chambered in new rifles, with Weatherby being the only one to chamber for the 300 Wby mag. So even if the Weatherby was the better feeding round, could a more reliably feeding rifle chambered in 300 RUM make it the more practical choice if reliability was key?


至于这两条枪的第三者(非广告)之介绍
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.300_Weatherby_Magnum
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.300_Remington_Ultra_Magnum


建议各位如果有细节问题, 不妨也在西文猎网上搜,在猎事上, 毕竟他们是“地主”啊

From left to right: 1 .17 HM2, 2 .17 HMR, 3 .22LR, 4 .22 WMR, 5 .17/23 SMc, 6 5mm/35 SMc, 7 .22 Horn

From left to right: 1 .17 HM2, 2 .17 HMR, 3 .22LR, 4 .22 WMR, 5 .17/23 SMc, 6 5mm/35 SMc, 7 .22 Horn
发表于 2009-7-25 15:26:05 | 显示全部楼层

Re: 请教子弹问题

liruiqin
请教 .300 Weatherby Magnum 与 .300 Remington Ultra Magnum 是一样的吗 :?:


Load No Caliber Grains/ Grams Bullet Style Brand Use
P300WBE 300 Weatherby Magnum 180 / 11.66 Barnes® Triple-Shock® X-Bullet Vital-Shok®  
P300RUMD 300 Rem. Ultra Magnum 180 / 11.66 Barnes® Triple-Shock® X-Bullet Vital-Shok®  


Ballistics Comparisons:
  Velocity in Feet per Second (To nearest 10 FPS)
Velocity
Load No Caliber Muzzle 100 Y 200 Y 300 Y 400 Y 500 Y
P300WBE 300 Weatherby Magnum 3110 2895 2690 2495 2307 2128
P300RUMD 300 Rem. Ultra Magnum 3150 2933 2727 2529 2341 2160


  Energy in Foot Pounds (To nearest 5 Foot Pounds)
Energy
Load No Caliber Muzzle 100 Y 200 Y 300 Y 400 Y 500 Y
P300WBE 300 Weatherby Magnum 3865 3350 2893 2487 2128 1810
P300RUMD 300 Rem. Ultra Magnum 3965 3438 2971 2557 2189 1865


  Wind Drift in Inches (at 10 MPH)
Wind Drift
Load No Caliber 100 Y 200 Y 300 Y 400 Y 500 Y
P300WBE 300 Weatherby Magnum 0.6 2.6 6.0 10.9 17.9
P300RUMD 300 Rem. Ultra Magnum 0.6 2.5 5.8 10.7 17.6


  Average Range
Average Range
Load No Caliber 50 Y 100 Y 200 Y 300 Y
P300WBE 300 Weatherby Magnum -0.3  -2.7 -10.2
P300RUMD 300 Rem. Ultra Magnum -0.3  -2.6 -9.8


  Long Range
Long Range
Load No Caliber 50 Y 100 Y 200 Y 300 Y 400 Y 500 Y
P300WBE 300 Weatherby Magnum 0.4 1.3  -6.1 -17.8 -36.2
P300RUMD 300 Rem. Ultra Magnum 0.4 1.3  -6.0 -17.3 -35.1
 楼主| 发表于 2009-7-25 17:17:11 | 显示全部楼层
看数据好像差不多 因为我有一只remington700 .300 wby mag 不知道用.300 Remington Ultra Mag 子弹行不行
发表于 2009-7-26 15:07:54 | 显示全部楼层
liruiqin
看数据好像差不多 因为我有一只remington700 .300 wby mag 不知道用.300 Remington Ultra Mag 子弹行不行

它们的长度差不多,.300 Remington Ultra Mag比.300 wby mag粗点,不能确定.300 Remington Ultra Mag是否能放到枪里。非常期待您实际的射击效果。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则



小黑屋|Archiver|手机版|北美户外俱乐部

GMT-8, 2024-12-23 10:07 , Processed in 0.056580 second(s), 8 queries , File On.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表