| 
 | 
 
 
 楼主 |
发表于 2012-4-18 08:10:22
|
显示全部楼层
 
 
 
Examination of the injured runner includes assessment not only of the  
injured area but of all related structures (ie, the runner’s entire “ 
kinetic chain”), noting any imbalances or deficits in structure (eg, leg  
length discrepancy), strength, flexibility, or motion. Discrepancies may  
exist between legs or between muscle groups of the same leg (eg, quadriceps  
disproportionately stronger than hamstrings). One way to organize each  
element (eg, observation, strength testing) of the physical examination is  
to begin with proximal structures (eg, spine and pelvis) and work distally.  
Careful observation of the patient’s walking and running gaits helps to  
confirm that the anatomic problems identified during a stationary  
examination affect biomechanical performance. 
 
Begin your assessment by asking the injured runner to stand in front of you, 
noting their posture and lower extremity alignment. Observe the legs from  
hip-to-foot looking for symmetry. Note the structure of the knee, especially 
genu varum (which may be associated with iliotibial band syndrome or medial 
meniscal pathology) or valgus (often seen in women with patellofemoral pain 
). Note the position of the patella and any apparent muscular asymmetry. Ask 
the patient to stand on one foot and then the other, watching for balance,  
control, and posture. Does the unsupported hip sag (ie, a positive  
Trendelenberg test)? A positive Trendelenberg test suggests weakness of the  
gluteus medius, a common finding in runners with hip and knee pain. Make  
note of foot structure and position. Does the runner have a normal, high, or 
flat arch? Ask the patient to walk and to squat. Watch for a limp,  
stiffness of one limb, and a tendency to shift weight off one limb. 
 
Screen for tenderness and altered mobility of the spine, pelvis (including  
sacroiliac joints), hips, knees, ankles, and feet before turning your  
attention to the area of complaint. Be sure to assess muscle strength and  
neurovascular status throughout the lower extremity. Weakness of the hip  
musculature (particularly hip abductors) is common among novice runners,  
frequently contributing to lower extremity pain, especially patellofemoral  
pain syndrome. (See "Patellofemoral pain syndrome".) 
 
The following findings may be noted during the examination: 
 
    Hip flexion, rotation, or abduction weakness is present with many lower  
extremity injuries, particularly those affecting the hip or knee. 
    Increased lumbar lordosis suggests weak anterior core muscles, a common  
condition in runners with hip weakness. 
    Vastus medialis atrophy or asymmetry can occur with patellofemoral pain  
syndrome (PFPS), or in athletes who have had knee surgery. 
    Tenderness along the medial tibial border bilaterally is often present  
with medial tibial stress syndrome (MTSS), or “shin splints.” 
    Loss of normal lumbar lordosis (with or without back pain) is often  
present with tight hamstrings. 
    Loss of internal rotation of the hip occurs with femoral neck stress  
fracture. 
    Asymmetry of the quadriceps muscles is common in runners with  
osteoarthritis of the hip. 
    Pain and/or a sense of “catching” in the groin with the knee flexed to 
90 degrees suggests a labral tear, but also may be seen with iliopsoas  
tendinopathy. 
    Localized tenderness and a positive hop test suggest a tibial stress  
fracture. 
    Achilles tendon thickening or nodules suggests Achilles tendinopathy. 
    Tenderness at the medial insertion of the plantar fascia into the  
calcaneus suggests plantar fasciitis. 
    Hallux limitus or hallux rigidus and reduced ankle dorsiflexion can  
develop with plantar fasciitis or calf muscle injuries. 
    Splayed toe sign and forefoot widening can occur with metatarsalgia. 
    Leg length inequality may be present with stress fractures, and possibly 
with iliotibial band syndrome and lower back and pelvic injuries. 
 
 
Diagnostic imaging, including plain radiographs, ultrasound, magnetic  
resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), and bone scan may be  
necessary in some cases to make a definitive diagnosis. However, the  
clinician should have a clear differential diagnosis in mind before ordering 
such studies. 
 
Once a diagnosis is made and a treatment plan established, the clinician and 
athlete should work together to uncover and eliminate potential  
contributing factors, as many running injuries appear to be multifactorial.  
The mainstay of treatment for the vast majority of running injuries is “ 
relative rest,” which means stopping running, or at a minimum significantly 
reducing mileage, while the injury heals. Depending upon the injury, most  
runners can maintain reasonable conditioning by performing non-impact  
exercises in a pool or on a bike, or by using other equipment (eg, rowing  
machine).  
 
SPECIFIC INJURIES 
 
Hip injuries 
 
Overview and approach — Hip injuries are less common in runners than  
injuries to the lower extremity and they can be difficult to diagnose.  
Nevertheless, during jogging, the hip joint is subjected to loads up to  
eight times body weight and both acute and chronic injuries can occur [55].  
In runners, the differential diagnosis of hip pain includes gluteus medius  
tendinopathy, piriformis syndrome, stress fracture of the femoral neck,  
labral tear, and, less often, radicular pain from the lumbar spine. Better  
understanding of the functional anatomy of the hip suggests a correlation  
between hip muscle weakness and injury to the low back or lower extremity in 
athletes, including runners [56-58]. 
 
Gluteus medius weakness and tendinopathy and piriformis syndrome — The  
gluteus medius originates along the external surface of the ilium and runs  
distally and laterally to its attachment on the greater trochanter of the  
femur (picture 1). The gluteus medius abducts the hip and assists with  
pelvic stability during running. Weakness of the muscle typically causes  
pain with hip abduction and rotation. Pain generally increases when the  
muscle is stretched and there may be focal tenderness at the muscle’s  
insertion, just medial and superior to the greater trochanter. Difficulty  
maintaining a level pelvis while standing on one leg (positive Trendelenburg 
sign) may be noted. 
 
The piriformis muscle is a small but important external rotator of the hip  
that crosses the sciatic nerve and is believed by some to cause sciatica- 
type pain when it compresses the nerve [59,60]. However, the existence of  
this so-called “piriformis syndrome” remains controversial and diagnosis  
is difficult [61-63]. Piriformis syndrome in the runner may be associated  
with foot overpronation, weakness of the gluteal muscles and other hip  
abductors, and tightness of the hip adductors. 
 
The mainstay of treatment for both gluteus medius tendinopathy and  
piriformis syndrome is physical therapy and correction of biomechanical  
abnormalities. Orthotics and massage therapy may be useful; acetaminophen  
and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs may be used for analgesia. There are 
reports of using injections of local anesthetics, glucocorticoids, and  
botulinum toxin (Botox) to treat piriformis syndrome [64]. 
 
Femoral neck stress fracture — Stress fractures of the femoral neck are an  
uncommon but important cause of hip or groin pain in the adult runner  
because of the relatively high risk of nonunion. (See 'Stress fractures'  
below.) 
 
Labral tear — The acetabular labrum is a ring of fibrocartilage and dense  
connective tissue attached to the bony rim of the acetabulum. It is thought  
to be largely avascular. Although the labrum’s function is not fully  
understood, it is thought to provide stability and decrease the stress  
placed on the hip joint. Therefore, a significant tear in the labrum can  
increase stress on the hip joint, decrease stability, and ultimately lead to 
damage of the articular cartilage. 
 
Labral tears are reported in sports that require frequent hip rotation, such 
as soccer and hockey, and in runners, especially female runners. Runners  
with a labral tear typically complain of pain in the anterior hip or groin.  
They may have mechanical symptoms, including clicking, locking, catching, or 
giving way (so-called “snapping hip”). Other hip injuries that may  
produce such mechanical symptoms include iliopsoas tendinopathy. 
 
Labral tears are complex and often frustrating to treat. Physical therapy  
has mixed results. Arthroscopic surgery is often helpful, but the recovery  
can be prolonged. Runners diagnosed with labral tears should be counseled  
carefully regarding the paucity of evidence for determining the best  
treatment and the benefits and risks of each approach. 
 
Iliopsoas tendinopathy — Iliopsoas tendinopathy produces symptoms similar  
to a labral tear but presents more often as anterior hip pain in younger  
athletes, especially after a rapid growth spurt, and is more easily treated. 
Athletes who repeatedly engage in forceful flexion of the hip, including  
track and field athletes (eg, hurdlers, jumpers), are at greatest risk.  
Examination usually reveals tight, painful hip flexors (picture 2).  
Iliopsoas tendinopathy typically responds within a few weeks to activity  
modification, acetaminophen and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, and  
physical therapy. 
 
Knee and thigh injuries 
 
Knee pain (patellofemoral pain syndrome) — Knee pain is among the most  
common complaints from runners. Most such runners are diagnosed with  
patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) [5,65]. Despite the prevalence of this  
diagnosis, no consensus exists about its etiology or the factors most  
responsible for causing pain. Overuse and malalignment are commonly cited  
causative factors. In addition, runners (especially females) with PFPS often 
have decreased strength in hip abduction, external rotation, and extension  
compared to healthy controls [66,67]. Patients with PFPS typically complain  
of anterior knee pain that worsens with squatting, running, prolonged  
sitting, or when ascending or descending steps. Pain is often poorly  
localized "under" or "around" the patella. Details about the diagnosis and  
management of PFPS are provided separately. (See "Patellofemoral pain  
syndrome".) 
 
Iliotibial band syndrome — The iliotibial band (ITB) consists of connective 
tissue that runs from the ilium to the anterolateral aspect of the proximal 
tibia (picture 3). It is involved in hip abduction and internal rotation,  
knee extension and flexion, and helps to stabilize the knee during running. 
 
The iliotibial band syndrome (ITBS), which occurs primarily in runners, is  
characterized by an aching or burning pain at the site where the ITB courses 
over the lateral femoral condyle; occasionally the pain radiates up the  
thigh toward the hip. Runners often complain of such lateral knee pain while 
running, but pain may persist after training, especially with activity that 
requires repetitive flexion and extension of the knee, such as ascending or 
descending stairs or standing from a seated position. The diagnosis of ITBS 
is clinical; no imaging is typically needed. 
 
The ITB does not attach to bone between the hip and knee, and for years many 
clinicians believed that repeated flexion and extension of the knee caused  
the band to rub back and forth over the lateral femoral condyle, creating  
friction and inflaming the tissue beneath the band. However, subsequent  
investigations suggest that the ITB moves very little and that the pain of  
ITBS results from compression of a layer of innervated fat and connective  
tissue between the ITB and lateral femoral epicondyle [68]. 
 
Biomechanical studies and our clinical experience suggest that the  
underlying causes of ITBS are multifactorial but that patients often fall  
into two major categories [69-71]. One group (usually less experienced or  
female runners) demonstrates weak hip abduction, increased hip adduction,  
and internal rotation of the knee (genu valgum); the other group (often  
advanced runners) manifests decreased hip adduction and external rotation of 
the knee (genu varum). Physical therapy for the first group should  
emphasize strengthening the hip abductors; therapy for the latter group  
should include stretching exercises to improve hip adduction. Other risk  
factors for ITBS include excessive running mileage, worn shoes, repetitive  
running on uneven terrain, and continually running in only one direction on  
a track [72]. 
 
Ice, analgesics (eg, acetaminophen and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs), 
and a short period of rest are usually effective at reducing acute  
discomfort. Glucocorticoid injections may be helpful for symptomatic relief  
in refractory or severe cases, or when there is associated bursitis, but  
there is little evidence supporting such treatment [73]. Once inflammation  
is reduced, the patient begins stretching and strengthening exercises to  
correct identified deficits [74,75]. A study comparing three common  
stretches for the ITB found all to be effective [76]. In one limited  
randomized trial, deep transverse friction massage was not beneficial [77]. 
 
Hamstring injuries — Hamstring injuries are typically acute; the injured  
runner complains of developing a sudden, sharp pain in the posterior thigh  
while running at high speed or up hills. Examination findings depend upon  
the severity of injury and may include a limping gait (due to the inability  
to fully extend the knee); ecchymosis; a visible or palpable defect in the  
hamstring muscle; focal tenderness; and pain or weakness with muscle  
contraction. Details about the diagnosis and management of hamstring muscle  
injuries are provided separately. (See "Hamstring injuries".) 
 
Knee OA — Exercise is recommended for most patients with OA of the hip or  
knee. Although water-based exercise is often suggested, multiple studies  
confirm the value of regimens involving full weightbearing exercise. (See " 
Nonpharmacologic therapy of osteoarthritis", section on 'Exercise'.) 
 
Despite this evidence, many clinicians subscribe to the traditional teaching 
that patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee should not run because  
it exacerbates the condition. The medical literature, however, does not  
support the contention that running contributes to the degeneration of  
articular cartilage in the knee [78]. Examples of such studies include: 
 
    A prospective cohort study followed 45 runners and 53 controls over 18  
years and, using a validated score to assess for OA, found no difference  
between the two groups in the progression or the number of severe cases of  
knee OA [79]. 
    Another prospective study of 16 runners and 13 nonrunners found no  
evidence that running predisposes to OA of the lower extremities [80]. 
    Multiple retrospective studies have found no evidence of premature  
damage of articular cartilage or increased risk for OA among long-distance  
runners [81-83]. 
    Small clinical and laboratory studies using MRI to evaluate the knees of 
long-distance runners report no significant damage to articular cartilage  
following a race and no major differences when images were compared to those 
of active nonrunners [84-86].  
 
Stress fractures — Stress fractures in runners occur most often in the  
tibia, but can develop in any bone of the lower extremity, including the  
metatarsals, navicular, and femoral neck [87]. Detailed discussions of  
stress fractures, including a description of those at high risk for nonunion 
, appear separately; a brief description and information of particular  
importance for runners is provided here. (See "Overview of stress fractures" 
and "Stress fractures of the tibia and fibula" and "Stress fractures of the 
metatarsal shaft".) 
 
When evaluating the runner with a suspected stress fracture, the clinician  
should ask for a description of the pain, running patterns and recent  
changes in training, shoe and orthotic wear, and prior injuries. Information 
about the patient’s nutrition and menstrual history, and any family  
history of metabolic bone disease, are also important. 
 
Typically, the runner with a stress fracture complains of focal pain that is 
insidious in onset, increases as a run progresses, and improves with rest.  
Over time, if the athlete persists in running despite such symptoms, pain  
occurs with less strenuous activity and ultimately at rest. Some runners  
present with acute onset of severe pain, which may result from a complete  
fracture at the site of a preexisting stress fracture. 
 
Important risk factors for developing stress fractures include a history of  
prior stress fracture, increasing volume and intensity of training, poor  
running biomechanics, female gender and menstrual irregularity, a diet poor  
in calcium, and poor bone health. The management of stress fractures in  
runners is discussed separately. (See "Overview of stress fractures",  
section on 'Treatment concepts'.) 
 
The clinician should be aware that stress fractures at high risk for  
nonunion (eg, femoral neck and navicular) are more common in runners than in 
other athletes. If a high-risk stress fracture is suspected, an aggressive  
work-up is warranted and immediate orthopedic consultation should be  
obtained if the diagnosis is confirmed. A history of recurrent stress  
fracture or a fracture in cancellous bone suggests that the runner’s bone  
mineral density may be low and should be measured. 
 
Femoral neck stress fractures should be suspected in any distance runner  
with groin pain of insidious onset, especially female distance runners at  
risk for the “female athlete triad” (eating disorder, amenorrhea, and  
osteoporosis). The female athlete triad is reviewed separately. (See " 
Amenorrhea and infertility associated with exercise".) 
 
Navicular stress fractures occur more often in male athletes participating  
in track and field events (eg, hurdlers, jumpers, sprinters) and middle  
distance runners [87]. The athlete with a navicular stress fracture often  
presents with insidious pain in the midfoot or arch that increases with  
jumping. 
 
Medial tibial stress syndrome (shin splints) and tibial stress fractures —  
Clinicians confronted by runners with shin pain must distinguish between  
stress fractures of the tibia and medial tibial stress syndrome (MTSS),  
often referred to as “shin splints.” Although the history may be similar,  
a focal, palpable area of tenderness is present in most patients with stress 
fractures, whereas tenderness is much more diffuse and there are no  
discrete palpable lesions in those with MTSS. Imaging may be necessary in  
some cases to rule out a stress fracture. Plain radiographs are normal in  
patients with shin splints, but may also be unrevealing early in the course  
of a stress fracture. (See "Stress fractures of the tibia and fibula",  
section on 'Clinical presentation and examination' and "Stress fractures of  
the tibia and fibula", section on 'Radiographic findings'.) 
 
Distinguishing between the two diagnoses affects treatment: a runner with a  
stress fracture should avoid running and pursue non-impact activities like  
swimming or cycling while the stress fracture heals, while the runner with  
MTSS can continue running but should reduce the total mileage. A systematic  
review found that shock-absorbing insoles may reduce symptoms and prevent  
recurrence of MTSS [88]. 
 
Chronic exertional compartment syndrome — Chronic exertional compartment  
syndrome (CECS) occurs when increased pressure within a muscle compartment  
reduces blood flow, leading to muscle ischemia and pain when metabolic  
demands cannot be met. The patient with CECS is often a young runner who  
describes gradually increasing pain in a specific muscle region (usually the 
lower leg) during exertion. The pain may be described as aching, squeezing, 
cramping, or tightness. Pain generally begins within several minutes of  
starting a run, often at a specific point in training. Runners can often  
describe the time or distance required for symptoms to develop. Pain  
resolves completely with rest, although not immediately upon stopping  
exercise. The diagnosis and management of CECS is discussed in detail  
separately. (See "Chronic exertional compartment syndrome".) 
 
Foot and ankle injuries — Foot and ankle injuries account for up to 20  
percent of running injuries, and are the most common injury reported by  
distance runners and marathoners [89]. This is not surprising given that the 
ground reaction forces the foot must absorb with each stride are several  
times body weight. The most common foot injuries in runners are overuse  
injuries of soft tissues, including tendons and fascia. 
 
Plantar fasciitis — Plantar fasciitis (PF) is the most common cause of  
rearfoot pain in runners. The predominant symptom of PF is pain in the  
plantar region of the foot that increases when initiating push-off while  
walking or running. The hallmark for diagnosis is focal point tenderness.  
The etiology of PF remains unclear but the condition is often attributed to  
training errors, biomechanical problems, and excessive foot pronation or  
supination, and is more common in older and heavier runners [89-91]. The  
biomechanical abnormality most often associated with PF is decreased  
dorsiflexion of the foot and toes and thus stretching is an important part  
of treatment. Another common biomechanical problem is weakness of the  
plantar flexors, which some clinicians believe is best treated with  
eccentric strengthening exercises. The diagnosis and management of PF is  
reviewed separately. (See "Plantar fasciitis and other causes of heel and  
sole pain", section on 'Plantar fasciitis'.) 
 
Tendon injuries — Runners are susceptible to tendon injuries at a number of 
sites, the Achilles being most common. Others include the peroneal,  
posterior tibial, and anterior tibial tendons (picture 4). 
 
Achilles tendinopathy occurs in up to 10 percent of elite runners annually [ 
92]; runners with more than 10 years of experience are at higher risk [93].  
Among former elite male distance runners, the lifetime risk is reported to  
be as high as 52 percent [94]. The biomechanical factors that predispose  
runners to Achilles tendinopathy remain unclear but are the subject of  
research [95-97]. Poor flexibility of the Achilles tendon, overpronation,  
and valgus or varus deformity of the calcaneus all affect rear-foot  
mechanics, possibly increasing torque on the Achilles. Some clinicians  
advocate using a heel pad or orthotic in runners to counteract this effect. 
 
Patients with Achilles tendinopathy typically complain of pain or stiffness  
2 to 6 cm above the posterior calcaneus. The pain is frequently described as 
burning, increases with activity, and is relieved by rest. Runners with the 
condition often have recently increased their training intensity or have  
been training rigorously for a long time. A history of excessive foot  
supination, increased speed work or hill training, or improper (eg, poorly  
fitting shoes, tennis instead of running shoes) or worn out footwear may be  
found. The diagnosis and management of Achilles tendinopathy is discussed  
separately. (See "Achilles tendinopathy and tendon rupture".) 
 
Peroneal tendon injury may be traumatic, usually from a lateral ankle sprain 
, or related to overuse and associated with excessive foot pronation and  
weak foot plantar flexors [98]. Examination reveals tenderness along the  
course of the tendon posterior or inferior to the lateral malleolus, which  
increases with resisted eversion. 
 
Posterior tibial tendinopathy is typically an overuse injury that develops  
following an abrupt increase in training intensity, and is associated with  
poor foot and calf flexibility and excessive foot pronation. Examination  
findings include tenderness along the course of the posterior tibial tendon  
posterior or inferior to the medial malleolus, which increases with resisted 
inversion. 
 
Anterior tibial tendinopathy is a common cause of anterior ankle pain in  
runners, and often develops following abrupt increases in training,  
particularly hill running. Examination often reveals tenderness, and  
possibly swelling, of the tendon as it crosses the ankle joint. Pain  
increases with resisted dorsiflexion. 
 
The treatment of overuse tendinopathies is discussed separately. (See " 
Overview of the management of overuse (chronic) tendinopathy".) 
 
First metatarsal phalangeal joint — Running generates substantial forces  
across the forefoot and thus can aggravate hallux rigidus or hallux valgus ( 
bunion) of the metatarsal phalangeal (MTP) joint of the great toe (ie, first 
MTP joint). The sesamoid bones located on the plantar surface of the MTP  
joint can become inflamed from running and may cause discomfort. 
 
Hallux rigidus and hallux valgus (bunion) — There is little high-quality  
evidence to provide insight into the causes and guide the management of  
hallux rigidus. Hallux rigidus is presumed to be a degenerative condition of 
the first MTP joint associated with either an acute injury (eg, forced  
hypertension of the great toe, so-called “turf toe”) or repetitive  
microtrauma, as would occur with running [99,100]. Genetic predisposition  
may play a role. The result is limited dorsiflexion of the first MTP joint;  
approximately 60 degrees of dorsiflexion is needed for normal gait. 
 
Runners with hallux rigidus are typically older than 30 and complain of pain 
at the dorsum of the great toe. However, some runners may present with  
vague lateral forefoot pain. This presentation is likely due to runners  
shifting their body weight to the lateral foot during the foot-strike phase  
of running to reduce the load on the great toe. It remains unclear whether  
running is a cause of hallux rigidus or aggravates symptoms elicited by  
other factors. Shoes with a toe box that is too small or pointed may  
contribute. 
 
Hallux valgus (ie, bunion) deformity is defined as a lateral deviation of  
the hallux (great toe) on the first metatarsal. The etiology of hallux  
valgus is multifactorial and likely involves abnormal mechanics and anatomy. 
Patients generally complain of a deformed and painful great toe. (See " 
Hallux valgus deformity (bunion)".) 
 
In runners with either of these conditions, mechanically limiting first MTP  
joint motion by using appropriate shoes and unloading techniques can be  
helpful. We suggest walking shoes with a wide toe box, stiff soles, rocker  
bottoms, and low heels. Comfortable running shoes with a wide toe box  
combined with techniques to reduce the impact on the first MTP joint, such  
as custom orthotics or cushioned insoles, reduce symptoms in many runners.  
Acetaminophen or nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs may be used for short- 
term pain relief. Ice can be applied following running. Glucocorticoid  
injections may provide short-term pain relief for those with mild hallux  
rigidus [101]. Consultation with a foot surgeon should be obtained for  
severe or recalcitrant cases, although there is little high-quality evidence 
to guide decisions about surgery or conservative care. 
 
Sesamoiditis — The sesamoids are pea-sized bones that function as pulleys  
for tendons (just as the patella does for the knee extensors) and assist  
with weightbearing. Inflammation or injury of the sesamoid bones located on  
the plantar surface of the first MTP joint can cause focal pain in runners,  
particularly sprinters (picture 5 and figure 1). The runner with  
sesamoiditis typically complains of pain at the area of the MTP joint with  
weightbearing that is exacerbated by walking, and even more so by running.  
Exquisite tenderness of the sesamoids is present, and is exacerbated by  
dorsiflexion of the great toe. Imaging is required to differentiate between  
sesamoiditis and a stress fracture. 
 
Both sesamoiditis and sesamoid stress fractures are notoriously difficult to 
treat and may require a short period of immobilization followed by  
prolonged rest from running. Runners can use alternative, nonweightbearing  
forms of exercise to maintain fitness. Treatment with custom orthotics, soft 
pads cut to relieve pressure on the sesamoids, and in severe cases  
glucocorticoid injections may be helpful, but there is little evidence to  
guide treatment. Women runners should avoid wearing high heels; shoes with a 
stiff sole (eg, clog) are often helpful. Consultation with a foot surgeon  
is reasonable in recalcitrant cases. 
 
Treatment of sesamoiditis does not differ significantly from that for  
sesamoid fractures. The evaluation and management of sesamoid fractures is  
discussed separately. (See "Sesamoid fractures of the foot".) 
 
Metatarsalgia — Pain in a runner’s forefoot that is not due to a  
metatarsal stress fracture is likely due to metatarsalgia or an interdigital 
neuroma. (See 'Stress fractures' above.) 
 
Metatarsalgia is a general term for pain that occurs along the ball of the  
foot. Most runners with metatarsalgia complain of pain in the forefoot  
during running; the examiner will find tenderness along the plantar surface  
just proximal to the metatarsal heads. The condition is often associated  
with overpronation and/or collapse of the transverse arch. A metatarsal pad  
placed proximal to the area of tenderness often relieves symptoms; in more  
severe cases, a custom orthotic may be needed. 
 
(Mortons) neuroma — Interdigital neuromas (often referred to as Mortons  
neuroma) are thought to be due to swelling and scar tissue formation on the  
small interdigital nerves. They most commonly involve the third webspace,  
but may also be seen in the second and fourth. 
 
The runner with a neuroma may complain of numbness of the involved toes or  
pain that increases with activity and is usually felt in the interspace  
between the third and fourth toes (figure 2) [102]. The diagnosis can be  
confirmed by noting a clicking sensation (Mulders sign) when palpating this  
interspace while simultaneously squeezing the metatarsal joints.  
Overpronation and tight shoes are often associated with the condition. 
 
An intermetatarsal bursitis can cause a similar pain. The use of magnetic  
resonance imaging (MRI) to diagnose Morton's neuroma is problematic because  
features consistent with neuroma may appear in as many as one-third of  
asymptomatic individuals [103,104]. 
 
Conservative treatment should precede expensive diagnostic procedures. This  
approach involves decreasing pressure on the metatarsal heads by using a  
metatarsal support or bar or padded shoe insert. Several studies have  
measured the loading pressures placed on metatarsals before and after use of 
metatarsal pads, bars, orthotics, and specialized orthopedic shoes [105-110 
]. In all reports, pain relief correlated with reduction in pressure. Proper 
placement of the inserts just proximal to the metatarsal head is important. 
Strength exercises for the intrinsic foot muscles are often part of  
conservative treatment. No randomized controlled studies have been performed 
to assess these interventions. 
 
Treatment inserts are often placed in both shoes, even when symptoms are  
unilateral, to ensure that the patient walks evenly, but bilateral pads are  
not always needed. Symptomatic relief often begins within a few days of  
insert use and pain may completely subside over several weeks. 
 
A broad-toed shoe that allows spreading of the metatarsal heads may be  
helpful. Proper shoe width should be determined while standing, using a  
professional shoe fitting device. If width has changed, older shoes should  
be discarded. 
 
If conservative measures fail to relieve symptoms, a single injection of a  
local anesthetic and glucocorticoid into the site of tenderness can be  
performed using a dorsal, not plantar, approach [111,112]. A plantar  
approach is more likely to cause complications. A combination of  
methylprednisolone (20 mg, or 0.5 mL) and one percent lidocaine (0.5 mL) may 
be used. 
 
Ultrasound guided injection is preferred by many practitioners although  
studies are limited. Ultrasound can distinguish neuroma from adjacent joint  
synovitis or bursitis. The majority of patients experience some relief with  
ultrasound-guided injection according to three case series involving a total 
of 113 patients [113-115]. Complications are rare; metatarsal fat pad  
atrophy can be debilitating but may occur less often if a dorsal injection  
is used. No randomized controlled trials of ultrasound guided injection have 
been published. 
 
Surgical removal of the neuroma and nerve may be necessary in patients who  
remain symptomatic after 9 to 12 months of nonoperative therapy. Surgical  
success rates of up to 80 to 90 percent have been reported in uncontrolled  
studies [111,116-118]. Surgery performed using a dorsal approach resulted in 
more timely weightbearing, return to work, and less painful scarring [119]. 
No randomized trials of surgery for plantar neuroma have been reported.  
Rarely, a neuroma may recur following surgery. Experience with injections of 
alcohol, phenol, and other substances and with nerve transplants is limited. 
 
Tarsal tunnel syndrome — Tarsal tunnel syndrome (TTS) is an uncommon source 
of foot pain in runners due to entrapment of the posterior tibial nerve ( 
PTN) or one of its branches as it courses behind the medial malleolus. The  
most common causes include an acute injury and its sequelae (eg, scar tissue 
) or repetitive microtrauma, as occurs with running, particularly in runners 
who overpronate. Runners with TTS complain of numbness or burning pain,  
usually along the plantar surface of the foot, although complaints may be  
localized to the medial plantar surface of the heel, mimicking plantar  
fasciitis. TTS typically worsens with running or at night. Findings are  
almost always sensory; muscle weakness is uncommon. A positive Tinel sign  
may be present. As in carpal tunnel syndrome, a positive sign occurs when  
symptoms are elicited by tapping over the path of the nerve. TTS is  
discussed in detail separately. (See "Overview of lower extremity peripheral 
nerve syndromes", section on 'Tarsal tunnel syndrome'.)  
 
 
 
INFORMATION FOR PATIENTS — UpToDate offers two types of patient education  
materials, “The Basics” and “Beyond the Basics.” The Basics patient  
education pieces are written in plain language, at the 5th to 6th grade  
reading level, and they answer the four or five key questions a patient  
might have about a given condition. These articles are best for patients who 
want a general overview and who prefer short, easy-to-read materials.  
Beyond the Basics patient education pieces are longer, more sophisticated,  
and more detailed. These articles are written at the 10th to 12th grade  
reading level and are best for patients who want in-depth information and  
are comfortable with some medical jargon. 
 
Here are the patient education articles that are relevant to this topic. We  
encourage you to print or e-mail these topics to your patients. (You can  
also locate patient education articles on a variety of subjects by searching 
on “patient info” and the keyword(s) of interest.) 
 
    Basics topic (see "Patient information: Achilles tendinopathy (The  
Basics)")  |   
 
 
 
 |